June 20, 2014 | Quote
Obama’s Iraq Announcement Wasn’t Exactly Earth-Shattering
…
As Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies explained to Business Insider, there are few militaries around the world that have received as much training and support from the U.S. as Iraq's. And although Obama said the U.S. would be involved in embassy security and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance activities, these were activities that U.S. personnel were carrying out in Iraq prior to the most recent presidential announcement. The U.S.'s involvement in the crisis isn't deepening by much.
“This is pragmatic and rooted in the principle that local and regional forces should be in the lead and that the U.S. should be in more of a supportive role,” Gartenstein-Ross says of Obama's announcement today.
He added that this approach was similar to the Obama administration's response to the jihadist takeover of northern Mali, or to the George W. Bush administration's handling of the Islamic Courts Union's control of Somalia. In both instances, the U.S. played a non-combat supporting role while other regional actors defined both the parameters and the outcome of the crises. A French intervention beat back Islamist militants who had taken Mali's northern half in 2013, while the U.S. provided assistance and political cover for the Ethiopian invasion that unseated the Courts Union in 2006….
Granted, those 300 advisors could expand intelligence collection in a way that makes future airstrikes more likely. “When Obama talks about [intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance] there's a decent chance that we'll end up flying surveillance drones over parts of Iraq to bolster our capabilities,” says Gartenstein-Ross, adding that that information could lay the groundwork for more kinetic U.S. action. But that doesn't amount to a change in U.S. strategy — even if it hints at future options in the region.
…